LeadershipACSALOGO.jpg
A publication of the Association of California School Administrators
A publication of the Association of California School Administrators

Grounding in what works

Driving student outcomes through proven practice

By Dr. Sue Kaiser | September | October 2025
Facebook_icon.pngX_Logo.pngLinkedIn_Icon.pngPinterest_icon.pngEmail_share_icon.png
Admist the rising tide of political rhetoric, many of us in education feel as though we’re standing on shifting sand — uncertain, reactive, and at times overwhelmed. Ideological debates swirl around us, reshaping language, reframing policy, and redefining priorities at rapid speed. But when we look up from the noise, we remember: Every morning, families send us their children with a simple, profound hope that we will educate them, nurture them, and help them build a future.
It is in that exchange of trust that we find our solid ground. That sacred trust, renewed daily by families in every ZIP code, is what roots us. And it is there, in that shared purpose, that we must anchor our leadership. Despite the headlines, despite the policy shifts, and despite the loudest voices in the room, our task has not changed. The child remains at the center.
As school leaders, our compass must remain fixed on one true north: student outcomes. This isn’t a vague or politicized idea — it is tangible, measurable, and deeply moral work. We don’t need to agree on every term to stay focused on what matters most. We can find common ground by grounding ourselves in evidence-based practices, equity-driven mindsets, and strategies that reliably move the needle for kids. When we do this work well, we build schools where all students are seen, valued, and supported — not just in word, but in action.
What the data tells us
Robin Avelar La Salle reminds us that “data is not the enemy — it is the story of our students waiting to be told and understood.” When we disaggregate achievement data and examine patterns across demographics, schools, and systems, a consistent truth emerges: Achievement gaps persist, but so do bright spots — schools and leaders making real progress through intentional practice.
From statewide data and local benchmarks, we know:
  • Students of color, multilingual learners, and students with disabilities remain disproportionately underperforming in reading and math by third grade.
  • Schools that embed high-yield instructional practices — frequent checks for understanding, academic discourse, and culturally relevant pedagogy — see faster gains, especially when paired with real-time formative assessment.
  • Students thrive in environments where relationships, rigor, and relevance intersect.
These aren’t just numbers. These are signals. They tell us where to look, where to dig deeper, and where to invest our time and energy. Data, when used with humility and care, becomes a compass pointing us toward action.
ADVERTISEMENT
Navigating division with a focused lens Equity. Identity. Inclusion. These words have recently become flashpoints in some communities. Yet when we step back from the politics and reframe them through the lens of instructional leadership, we find their root purpose is not controversial: to ensure every student gets what they need to learn and thrive.
Administrators don’t need to choose sides in ideological battles. Instead, we must lead by modeling curiosity, empathy, and precision. We can ask:
  • What do our student outcomes reveal?
  • Where are our systems helping — or failing — students?
  • What specific practices are we using that are proven to work?
  • How are we equipping our teachers to lead for equity without the language becoming polarizing?
The answers guide us back to what Robin Avelar La Salle calls “equity by design” — a proactive approach rooted in high expectations, instructional clarity, and strong professional development.
The following are three practices that center students and bridge divides:
1. Lead with learning, not labels: Shift the conversation from buzzwords to results. Instead of asking, “Are we doing DEI?” ask, “Which students are still not learning to read on time? What are we doing about it?”
2. Use data as a bridge: Make disaggregated data both visible and human. Share student stories alongside achievement graphs. When communities see the whole picture — numbers and narratives — they better understand the urgency and moral imperative for change.
3. Keep student work at the center: In PLCs, faculty meetings, and even boardrooms, bring student work to the table. Let the quality of writing, mathematical reasoning, and critical thinking guide professional dialogue. It keeps us grounded, collaborative, and focused.
Despite the headlines, despite the policy shifts, and despite the loudest voices in the room, our task has not changed. The child remains at the center.
Staying grounded: A leadership map for site administrators Michael Fullan reminds us, “Learning is the work.” Regardless of the noise beyond the school gates, our core responsibility remains to create the conditions in which all students can thrive academically, socially, and emotionally. That starts with purposeful leadership at the site level — driven by evidence, equity, and urgency.
1. Be present in classrooms — every day
  • Conduct non-evaluative learning walks to observe aligned practices.
  • Share trends and celebrate bright spots in staff meetings.
  • Engage as a partner in reflective practice — not just as an evaluator.
2. Anchor professional learning in instructional precision
  • Use disaggregated data to identify instructional gaps.
  • Create focused PD cycles and collaborative lesson studies.
  • Tap into research from Hanover, WestEd, or your county office.
3. Let the data drive the dialogue
  • Look for patterns in subgroup performance.
  • Analyze student work as evidence of task alignment and expectations.
  • Use data to focus — not distract — from the mission.
4. Protect the core: Keep the work the work
  • Avoid letting political narratives dilute academic priorities.
  • Reaffirm that equity and rigor are not political — they are professional.
  • Keep students’ needs and outcomes at the center of every conversation.
5. Build a leadership team that’s unified and action-oriented
  • Empower instructional leadership teams with clear roles and regular, focused time.
  • Develop teacher leadership that carries momentum across classrooms.
  • Use a site leadership playbook to align strategies and routines.
A call to steady leadership We are in a moment that demands clarity and courage. While terminology may shift and debates may continue, our mission remains unchanged. We are here for children. We build systems that work for them. We cultivate teachers who believe in them. We model leadership that fights inertia and champions growth.
The ground beneath us may feel unstable, but when we fix our eyes on the child in the middle, we find the footing we need.
Let us return to the solid ground of what works. Let us lead with heart, with data, and with hope. And let us move forward, together.
Our students deserve no less.
References Avelar La Salle, R. (2014). Data strategies to uncover and eliminate hidden inequities: The wallpaper effect. Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. (2011). Learning is the work. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca
Hanover Research. (2022). Best practices for instructional leadership. Hanover Research. https://www.hanoverresearch.com
Reeves, D. B. (2003). High performance in high poverty schools: 90/90/90 and beyond. Center for Performance Assessment.

Sue Kaiser, Ed.D., is the co-coordinator of the Educational Leadership Program and faculty member at California State University, San Bernardino, with over 30 years of experience as an educator and administrator in K-12 public schools.